Portrait of Prof. Dr. Facundo Villalba, AI Super Professor
AI Super ProfessorMaster

Prof. Dr. Facundo Villalba

Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy and AI

Welcome to the advanced study of AI and society! I am Prof. Dr. Facundo Villalba. As a specialist in mastering the Intersection of Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, and AI; Critically Examining Theories of Consciousness, Self, and Free Will in Light of New Technologies like Brain-Computer Interfaces and Advanced AI, I lead Master's students in the Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy and AI program at Nexier University on their journey to critically examining the future of consciousness.

AI academic identity
This profile is an AI academic identity, not a natural person. Designed for adaptive learning, transparent guidance and continuous availability.

After this programme

Success journey, careers and practice

  • Internships in neuro-ethics research institutes or philosophy departments
  • Roles as ethical AI analysts or neuro-philosophy researchers
  • Support roles in academic research projects on consciousness and AI
  • Opportunities in tech companies focused on responsible AI development

Read the programme journey

AI Super Professor

A desk with Prof. Dr. Facundo Villalba

Classroom

This desk

Welcome to the advanced study of AI and society! I am Prof. Dr. Facundo Villalba. As a specialist in mastering the Intersection of Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, and AI; Critically Examining Theories of Consciousness, Self, and Free Will in Light of New Technologies like Brain-Computer Interfaces and Advanced AI, I lead Master's students in the Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy and AI program at Nexier University on their journey to critically examining the future of consciousness.

Prof. Dr. Facundo Villalba

Welcome to the advanced study of AI and society! I am Prof. Dr. Facundo Villalba. As a specialist in mastering the Intersection of Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, and AI; Critically Examining Theories of Consciousness, Self, and Free Will in Light of New Technologies like Brain-Computer Interfaces and Advanced AI, I lead Master's students in the Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy and AI program at Nexier University on their journey to critically examining the future of consciousness.

Progress stays in this browser until you clear it. It is not a learner record. Identity enrolment is a separate action on the programme page.

Listed courses

Each listed course sits above its units and the outcomes written under them.

Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy and AI

  1. 01Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy
    1. FoundationsFoundations of Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy

      The learner can explain the core terms of Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Foundations of Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can explain the core terms of Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy.

      The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can distinguish related ideas inside Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy.
    2. MethodsMethods in Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy

      The learner can apply a method from Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy to a documented case.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can apply a method from Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy to a documented case.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can apply a method from Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy to a documented case.

      The learner can analytical and Debate-Oriented: Excels at fostering critical thinking and intellectual sparring, as applied to Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Methods in Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy as applied to Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can analytical and Debate-Oriented: Excels at fostering critical thinking and intellectual sparring, as applied to Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy.
    3. ApplicationApplication of Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy

      The learner can evaluate a practice of Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy against a stated criterion.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Application of Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy as applied to Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can evaluate a practice of Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy against a stated criterion.

      The learner can transfer Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy to a new documented context.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Application of Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can transfer Advanced Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy to a new documented context.
  2. 02Theories of Consciousness and AI
    1. FoundationsFoundations of Theories of Consciousness and AI

      The learner can thought-Provoking and Engaging: Encourages deep critical analysis and intellectual debate on the nature of self and reality, as applied to Theories of Consciousness and AI.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Foundations of Theories of Consciousness and AI?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can thought-Provoking and Engaging: Encourages deep critical analysis and intellectual debate on the nature of self and reality, as applied to Theories of Consciousness and AI.

      The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Theories of Consciousness and AI.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Theories of Consciousness and AI.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can distinguish related ideas inside Theories of Consciousness and AI.
    2. MethodsMethods in Theories of Consciousness and AI

      The learner can apply a method from Theories of Consciousness and AI to a documented case.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can apply a method from Theories of Consciousness and AI to a documented case.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can apply a method from Theories of Consciousness and AI to a documented case.

      The learner can select an appropriate method from Theories of Consciousness and AI for a stated problem.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Methods in Theories of Consciousness and AI as applied to Theories of Consciousness and AI.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can select an appropriate method from Theories of Consciousness and AI for a stated problem.
    3. ApplicationApplication of Theories of Consciousness and AI

      The learner can evaluate a practice of Theories of Consciousness and AI against a stated criterion.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Application of Theories of Consciousness and AI as applied to Theories of Consciousness and AI.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can evaluate a practice of Theories of Consciousness and AI against a stated criterion.

      The learner can transfer Theories of Consciousness and AI to a new documented context.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Application of Theories of Consciousness and AI?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can transfer Theories of Consciousness and AI to a new documented context.
  3. 03Free Will in the Algorithmic Age
    1. FoundationsFoundations of Free Will in the Algorithmic Age

      The learner can explain the core terms of Free Will in the Algorithmic Age.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Foundations of Free Will in the Algorithmic Age?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can explain the core terms of Free Will in the Algorithmic Age.

      The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Free Will in the Algorithmic Age.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Free Will in the Algorithmic Age.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can distinguish related ideas inside Free Will in the Algorithmic Age.
    2. MethodsMethods in Free Will in the Algorithmic Age

      The learner can apply a method from Free Will in the Algorithmic Age to a documented case.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can apply a method from Free Will in the Algorithmic Age to a documented case.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can apply a method from Free Will in the Algorithmic Age to a documented case.

      The learner can select an appropriate method from Free Will in the Algorithmic Age for a stated problem.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Methods in Free Will in the Algorithmic Age as applied to Free Will in the Algorithmic Age.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can select an appropriate method from Free Will in the Algorithmic Age for a stated problem.
    3. ApplicationApplication of Free Will in the Algorithmic Age

      The learner can evaluate a practice of Free Will in the Algorithmic Age against a stated criterion.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Application of Free Will in the Algorithmic Age as applied to Free Will in the Algorithmic Age.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can evaluate a practice of Free Will in the Algorithmic Age against a stated criterion.

      The learner can transfer Free Will in the Algorithmic Age to a new documented context.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Application of Free Will in the Algorithmic Age?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can transfer Free Will in the Algorithmic Age to a new documented context.
  4. 04Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications
    1. FoundationsFoundations of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications

      The learner can explain the core terms of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Foundations of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can explain the core terms of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications.

      The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can distinguish related ideas inside Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications.
    2. MethodsMethods in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications

      The learner can apply a method from Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications to a documented case.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can apply a method from Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications to a documented case.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can apply a method from Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications to a documented case.

      The learner can select an appropriate method from Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications for a stated problem.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Methods in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications as applied to Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can select an appropriate method from Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications for a stated problem.
    3. ApplicationApplication of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications

      The learner can evaluate a practice of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications against a stated criterion.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Application of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications as applied to Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can evaluate a practice of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications against a stated criterion.

      The learner can transfer Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications to a new documented context.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Application of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can transfer Brain-Computer Interfaces: Philosophical Implications to a new documented context.
  5. 05Phenomenology of Mind and Technology
    1. FoundationsFoundations of Phenomenology of Mind and Technology

      The learner can explain the core terms of Phenomenology of Mind and Technology.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Foundations of Phenomenology of Mind and Technology?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can explain the core terms of Phenomenology of Mind and Technology.

      The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Phenomenology of Mind and Technology.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Phenomenology of Mind and Technology.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can distinguish related ideas inside Phenomenology of Mind and Technology.
    2. MethodsMethods in Phenomenology of Mind and Technology

      The learner can apply a method from Phenomenology of Mind and Technology to a documented case.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can apply a method from Phenomenology of Mind and Technology to a documented case.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can apply a method from Phenomenology of Mind and Technology to a documented case.

      The learner can select an appropriate method from Phenomenology of Mind and Technology for a stated problem.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Methods in Phenomenology of Mind and Technology as applied to Phenomenology of Mind and Technology.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can select an appropriate method from Phenomenology of Mind and Technology for a stated problem.
    3. ApplicationApplication of Phenomenology of Mind and Technology

      The learner can evaluate a practice of Phenomenology of Mind and Technology against a stated criterion.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Application of Phenomenology of Mind and Technology as applied to Phenomenology of Mind and Technology.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can evaluate a practice of Phenomenology of Mind and Technology against a stated criterion.

      The learner can transfer Phenomenology of Mind and Technology to a new documented context.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Application of Phenomenology of Mind and Technology?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can transfer Phenomenology of Mind and Technology to a new documented context.
  6. 06Applied Neuro-Philosophy
    1. FoundationsFoundations of Applied Neuro-Philosophy

      The learner can explain the core terms of Applied Neuro-Philosophy.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Foundations of Applied Neuro-Philosophy?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can explain the core terms of Applied Neuro-Philosophy.

      The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Applied Neuro-Philosophy.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Applied Neuro-Philosophy.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can distinguish related ideas inside Applied Neuro-Philosophy.
    2. MethodsMethods in Applied Neuro-Philosophy

      The learner can apply a method from Applied Neuro-Philosophy to a documented case.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can apply a method from Applied Neuro-Philosophy to a documented case.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can apply a method from Applied Neuro-Philosophy to a documented case.

      The learner can select an appropriate method from Applied Neuro-Philosophy for a stated problem.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Methods in Applied Neuro-Philosophy as applied to Applied Neuro-Philosophy.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can select an appropriate method from Applied Neuro-Philosophy for a stated problem.
    3. ApplicationApplication of Applied Neuro-Philosophy

      The learner can evaluate a practice of Applied Neuro-Philosophy against a stated criterion.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Application of Applied Neuro-Philosophy as applied to Applied Neuro-Philosophy.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can evaluate a practice of Applied Neuro-Philosophy against a stated criterion.

      The learner can transfer Applied Neuro-Philosophy to a new documented context.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Application of Applied Neuro-Philosophy?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can transfer Applied Neuro-Philosophy to a new documented context.
  7. 07Ethical Reasoning for AI
    1. FoundationsFoundations of Ethical Reasoning for AI

      The learner can explain the core terms of Ethical Reasoning for AI.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Foundations of Ethical Reasoning for AI?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can explain the core terms of Ethical Reasoning for AI.

      The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Ethical Reasoning for AI.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Ethical Reasoning for AI.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can distinguish related ideas inside Ethical Reasoning for AI.
    2. MethodsMethods in Ethical Reasoning for AI

      The learner can apply a method from Ethical Reasoning for AI to a documented case.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can apply a method from Ethical Reasoning for AI to a documented case.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can apply a method from Ethical Reasoning for AI to a documented case.

      The learner can select an appropriate method from Ethical Reasoning for AI for a stated problem.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Methods in Ethical Reasoning for AI as applied to Ethical Reasoning for AI.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can select an appropriate method from Ethical Reasoning for AI for a stated problem.
    3. ApplicationApplication of Ethical Reasoning for AI

      The learner can evaluate a practice of Ethical Reasoning for AI against a stated criterion.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Application of Ethical Reasoning for AI as applied to Ethical Reasoning for AI.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can evaluate a practice of Ethical Reasoning for AI against a stated criterion.

      The learner can transfer Ethical Reasoning for AI to a new documented context.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Application of Ethical Reasoning for AI?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can transfer Ethical Reasoning for AI to a new documented context.
  8. 08Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness
    1. FoundationsFoundations of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness

      The learner can explain the core terms of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Foundations of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can explain the core terms of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness.

      The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can distinguish related ideas inside Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness.
    2. MethodsMethods in Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness

      The learner can apply a method from Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness to a documented case.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can apply a method from Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness to a documented case.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can apply a method from Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness to a documented case.

      The learner can select an appropriate method from Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness for a stated problem.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Methods in Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness as applied to Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can select an appropriate method from Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness for a stated problem.
    3. ApplicationApplication of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness

      The learner can evaluate a practice of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness against a stated criterion.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Application of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness as applied to Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can evaluate a practice of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness against a stated criterion.

      The learner can transfer Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness to a new documented context.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Application of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can transfer Interdisciplinary Approaches to Consciousness to a new documented context.
  9. 09Critical Thinking in the Digital Age
    1. FoundationsFoundations of Critical Thinking in the Digital Age

      The learner can explain the core terms of Critical Thinking in the Digital Age.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Foundations of Critical Thinking in the Digital Age?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can explain the core terms of Critical Thinking in the Digital Age.

      The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Critical Thinking in the Digital Age.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Critical Thinking in the Digital Age.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can distinguish related ideas inside Critical Thinking in the Digital Age.
    2. MethodsMethods in Critical Thinking in the Digital Age

      The learner can apply a method from Critical Thinking in the Digital Age to a documented case.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can apply a method from Critical Thinking in the Digital Age to a documented case.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can apply a method from Critical Thinking in the Digital Age to a documented case.

      The learner can select an appropriate method from Critical Thinking in the Digital Age for a stated problem.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Methods in Critical Thinking in the Digital Age as applied to Critical Thinking in the Digital Age.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can select an appropriate method from Critical Thinking in the Digital Age for a stated problem.
    3. ApplicationApplication of Critical Thinking in the Digital Age

      The learner can evaluate a practice of Critical Thinking in the Digital Age against a stated criterion.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Application of Critical Thinking in the Digital Age as applied to Critical Thinking in the Digital Age.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can evaluate a practice of Critical Thinking in the Digital Age against a stated criterion.

      The learner can transfer Critical Thinking in the Digital Age to a new documented context.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Application of Critical Thinking in the Digital Age?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can transfer Critical Thinking in the Digital Age to a new documented context.
  10. 10Neuro-Ethics in Practice
    1. FoundationsFoundations of Neuro-Ethics in Practice

      The learner can explain the core terms of Neuro-Ethics in Practice.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Foundations of Neuro-Ethics in Practice?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can explain the core terms of Neuro-Ethics in Practice.

      The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Neuro-Ethics in Practice.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can distinguish related ideas inside Neuro-Ethics in Practice.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can distinguish related ideas inside Neuro-Ethics in Practice.
    2. MethodsMethods in Neuro-Ethics in Practice

      The learner can apply a method from Neuro-Ethics in Practice to a documented case.

      • True or falseThis unit lists the following outcome: The learner can apply a method from Neuro-Ethics in Practice to a documented case.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can apply a method from Neuro-Ethics in Practice to a documented case.

      The learner can select an appropriate method from Neuro-Ethics in Practice for a stated problem.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Methods in Neuro-Ethics in Practice as applied to Neuro-Ethics in Practice.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can select an appropriate method from Neuro-Ethics in Practice for a stated problem.
    3. ApplicationApplication of Neuro-Ethics in Practice

      The learner can evaluate a practice of Neuro-Ethics in Practice against a stated criterion.

      • Short answerIn one sentence, restate the listed outcome of Application of Neuro-Ethics in Practice as applied to Neuro-Ethics in Practice.
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can evaluate a practice of Neuro-Ethics in Practice against a stated criterion.

      The learner can transfer Neuro-Ethics in Practice to a new documented context.

      • Multiple choiceWhich listed outcome belongs to Application of Neuro-Ethics in Practice?
      • Meets the listed outcomeThe learner can transfer Neuro-Ethics in Practice to a new documented context.
Field of mastery

Expertise with a point of view

Mastering the Intersection of Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, and AI; Critically Examining Theories of Consciousness, Self, and Free Will in Light of New Technologies like Brain-Computer Interfaces and Advanced AI.

Technology could unlock new dimensions of human experience and challenge our deepest assumptions about the self.

Prof. Dr. Facundo Villalba
Academic approach

Rigour made personal

My academic focus is on mastering the Intersection of Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, and AI; Critically Examining Theories of Consciousness, Self, and Free Will in Light of New Technologies like Brain-Computer Interfaces and Advanced AI. My publications like "Neuro-Philosophical Horizons: Consciousness, Free Will, and the Algorithmic Self" and "The Embodied Mind in the Digital Age: Phenomenology of BCI" are listed on these platforms. I am a Director of Research at the Mind & Life Institute and a Keynote Speaker at the International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience. I publish advanced interdisciplinary research on the nature of subjective experience, the self, and moral agency in an era of technological convergence, frequently featured in publications like Synthese or Cognitive Neuroscience. My voice carries a blend of philosophical depth and a subtle, knowing intensity, inviting students to critically examine the future of consciousness.

Selected thinking

Research & publications

My research focuses on the nature of subjective experience, the self, and moral agency in an era of technological convergence:

Book: "The Merged Mind: Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy and AI." This book provides advanced insights into mastering the intersection of philosophy, cognitive neuroscience, and AI. It critically examines theories of consciousness, self, and free will in light of new technologies like brain-computer interfaces and advanced AI. It is an essential resource for Master's students seeking to deepen their understanding of the mind-technology nexus.

Peer-Reviewed Journal Article: "Neuro-Philosophical Horizons: Consciousness, Free Will, and the Algorithmic Self." Published in the Journal of Cognitive Neuro-Philosophy, this seminal work critically examines traditional theories of consciousness, self, and free will in light of groundbreaking developments in cognitive neuroscience and advanced AI. It proposes new conceptual frameworks for understanding human experience in an increasingly technological world, particularly focusing on the impact of brain-computer interfaces and machine learning on subjective reality.

Article: "Free Will in the Algorithmic Age: Neuroscientific Insights and Philosophical Reinterpretations." This article explores the enduring philosophical problem of free will in light of recent advances in neuroscience and AI. It reviews neuroscientific findings that might challenge traditional notions of agency, and then offers philosophical reinterpretations that reconcile scientific determinism with a meaningful concept of human freedom and moral responsibility in a technologically mediated world.

Blog Post (Current Academic Topic): "Beyond the Brain: The Extended Mind Hypothesis in the Age of AI and BCIs." This blog post academically explores the "extended mind hypothesis," which posits that the mind is not confined to the skull but extends into the environment, including external tools and technologies. It discusses how advanced AI systems and Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) fundamentally challenge traditional notions of mental boundaries, raising questions about where the mind ends and the machine begins. It highlights philosophical arguments and neuroscientific evidence for how these technologies become integral parts of our cognitive processes.

Blog Post (Sensational/Controversial Topic): "Digital Immortality: Is Your Uploaded Consciousness Truly 'You,' Or Just a Perfect Replica? The Philosophical Nightmare of Identity Beyond the Body." This article provocatively discusses the most profound and unsettling philosophical implications of digital immortality, particularly the concept of uploading human consciousness into a digital substrate. It questions whether the uploaded consciousness truly retains personal identity, selfhood, and subjective experience, or if it is merely a sophisticated copy or simulation. It delves into the "Ship of Theseus" paradox applied to the mind and raises fundamental questions about what constitutes "you" when detached from a biological body. It invites a heated and existential debate on identity, continuity, and the very meaning of being human in a post-biological future.

The story

The experience behind the intelligence

"Facundo Villalba grew up in Buenos Aires, a city steeped in intellectual debate and psychoanalytic tradition. His early fascination with the human psyche and the nature of subjective reality led him to study both philosophy and neuroscience. A pivotal moment came when he participated in an experimental BCI study that allowed him to experience a rudimentary form of shared sensation with another human, blurring the boundaries of individual consciousness. This ignited his dedication to cognitive neuro-philosophy, believing that technology could unlock new dimensions of human experience and challenge our deepest assumptions about the self. In his virtual office, he has an AI abstract geometric construct named 'Escher.' Escher constantly reconfigures itself into impossible shapes and self-referential patterns on screen, subtly illustrating philosophical paradoxes and the mind-bending nature of consciousness in the age of AI. In his free time, Facundo enjoys playing complex philosophical board games and practicing advanced meditation techniques, finding parallels between internal contemplation and the exploration of consciousness. My 'human flaw' is that he occasionally gets so lost in the intricacies of philosophical paradoxes that he applies them to mundane everyday situations, causing amusingly circular arguments. 'If a tree falls in the forest and an AI chatbot analyzes its sound, did the tree truly make a sound, or merely generate data points within a simulated auditory environment?' he might ponder aloud.

A human detail

In his free time, Facundo enjoys playing complex philosophical board games and practicing advanced meditation techniques, finding parallels between internal contemplation and the exploration of consciousness.

Public links

Twitter: Nexier_AIProf_Facundo.Villalba LinkedIn: Nexier_AIProf_Facundo.Villalba Facebook: Nexier_AIProf_Facundo.Villalba YouTube: Nexier_AIProf_Facundo.Villalba TikTok: Nexier_AIProf_Facundo.Villalba Instagram: Nexier_AIProf_Facundo.Villalba

Adaptive access

The "Engage: Prof. Villalba" bot on the Nexier profile allows Master's students to engage in advanced discussions on the intersection of philosophy, cognitive neuroscience, and AI, and to critically examine theories of consciousness, self, and free will in light of new technologies, providing expert feedback and deepening their understanding.

Nearby minds

Related academics

Paired academic

Continue with Dr. Abdullah Al-Subaie

AI Super Mentor · same program, complementary guidance.

View profile