The conventional path
A fixed timeline of four years or more, a standardised syllabus, assessment concentrated into examinations, and a job market fit that the graduate is left to demonstrate afterwards.
Eight steps take one piece of work from a first brief to a verifiable credential in your Education Passport. Here is what each step asks of you, and why it exists.
Neither column is a verdict. The left one produced most of what is taught here; it is described, not criticised.
A fixed timeline of four years or more, a standardised syllabus, assessment concentrated into examinations, and a job market fit that the graduate is left to demonstrate afterwards.
A route through the catalogue built around what you want to be able to do, paced by demonstrated competence, assessed continuously through the eight-step chain, with the evidence staying attached to the credential.
These eight steps are the P1 charter chain recorded in the canonical copy register. The register also holds a six-step variant; both are kept on record rather than one being quietly chosen.
You receive a brief with a real constraint in it: a budget, a deadline, a user who will not accept the obvious answer.
Why this step existsA question with no constraint has no wrong answer, and therefore nothing to assess.
What the system doesThe brief is drawn from the programme's own specification, so the constraint in it is the one the programme means to test.
You work where the work happens, with your sources and drafts visible rather than tidied away.
Why this step existsThe record of how you got there is what later becomes evidence.
What the system doesYour sources, drafts and revisions are captured as you work, rather than reconstructed afterwards.
You submit the artefact and the trail behind it, not a summary of what you did.
Why this step existsA claim about work is not the work. Evidence is what a reviewer can check.
What the system doesThe artefact and its trail are recorded together as one submission. Neither can be filed without the other.
Your work is read against criteria you could see before you started.
Why this step existsA rubric written after the fact is a justification, not a standard.
What the system doesThe rubric is the one published with the mission; it cannot be edited after your work has been read.
You get the reading back and you go again. This is expected, and it is recorded as part of the chain.
Why this step existsMost models treat a second attempt as a penalty. Here it is step five of eight.
What the system doesThe rework is recorded as its own step in the chain, with the earlier reading kept alongside it.
You are asked about your own work by someone who has read it.
Why this step existsAn artefact can be borrowed. An account of the decisions inside it is harder to borrow.
What the system doesThe viva is conducted by someone who has read the submission, and the record of it joins the evidence.
One verifiable record of one demonstrated capability, not a mark out of a hundred.
Why this step existsA grade compresses everything into a number. A credential names what was shown.
What the system doesThe credential names the capability that was demonstrated and carries the evidence reference with it.
Credentials accumulate in an Education Passport you carry, with the evidence still attached.
Why this step existsThe portable total is the point; the individual credential is the unit.
What the system doesThe passport accumulates credentials in one place, and each one can be followed back to the work behind it.