A comparison against a brick campus needs a bound measurement. None is named.
The design is remote. The carbon number is not measured.
The source asked for a dated sustainability report with a document ID. This university has not run that report. A campus-free model is not the same as a published emissions figure.
No reporting period, no document ID and no comparison table. Challenge carbon and cost slots stay empty.
Structure is not an environmental audit
Remote delivery is how this university is built. That is a design choice. It is not a measured footprint.
What the source dated and this university has not run
Each title is kept so the shelf is legible. Invented rates stay off the page.
Judge the empty slot, not a borrowed number
A university that will not reprint another brand's carbon cut is easier to trust than one that borrowed the model.